Search

Bo Sanders: Public Theology

updating & innovating for today

Category

video

Bound In Conflict & UnBound In Love

We live in a time of division and conflict.

It is perfect timing then, that our topic this week comes from Galatians 3 and says, “In Christ, there is neither male nor female, slave nor free, Jew nor Gentile … all are one.”

Usually when this topic comes up people want to focus on how Christ’s love “bridges” the divides between us.

I want to take it a step further! I want to look at how:

A) we are bound up in those categories of sex, religion, and politics

B) Christ’s love ruptures those categories and un-binds us from them

The love of God doesn’t just bridge the divisions among us – it binds us together in love and undermines the very categories themselves.

God’s love calls into question the human categories of:

  • Gender
  • Sexual Orientation
  • Religion
  • Politics

Love UnBound doesn’t just help us bridge the difference between us – it unbinds us to see the other in such a different way that our categories themselves are called into question.

Here is a short video – let me know what you think …

LiveStream Sermon

We did a little experiment last week with Facebook Live. The feedback was good so we will be improving the audio and visual quality.

If you want to check out a short sermon (like if you don’t make it church tomorrow), I hope that you will be encouraged.  Below is the link [even though it won’t embed for some reason]

https://www.facebook.com/plugins/video.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2FBoCSanders%2Fvideos%2F1976540172376751%2F&show_text=0&width=560

If that doesn’t work, here is a simple link

https://www.facebook.com/BoCSanders/videos/1976540172376751/

If you want to listen to a whole gathering from Vermont Hills UMC, we recorded the whole service last week and have 35 min of highlights:

http://vermonthillsumc.org/listen-to-a-full-service/

Be well and happy listening/watching

Video: Fragmented & Fractured

Here is a follow up video for the blog post (2 weeks ago)

You can read the full blog at [this link] and either comment here or there. I look forward to continuing the conversation.

Next up: There is no neutral anymore

Christianism: 5 Steps

Yesterday’s post on Christianism is Frankenstein Christianity is here as a 6 min video

Step 1: Formalize
Step 2: Hierarchy/Authority
Step 3: Military Power/ Violence
Step 4: In/Out Boundary
Step 5: Membership not based on faithfulness/fidelity

You now have an ‘Ism’.  This “floating signifier” is untethered from its anchor teaching and model.

Bible: Best and Worst

My friend Erika Spaet made this eye-opening video about the B-I-B-L-E.

I laughed. I cringed.  I was challenged.  It is a wonderful 6 minute video.

I hope that you find it as helpful and inspiring as I did.

Word of God from Erika Spaet on Vimeo.

 

Church Health not Growth

Last month I posted about measuring ministry differently for the new century.

In this video I want to talk about some other metrics for measuring church health.

We all know that “nickels & noses” doesn’t tell us if ministry is actually happening.

Neither do the following suggestions but at least they are more interesting:

  • Square footage (3,700 sq. ft)
  • Pounds (400 vs. 300 lbs)
  • Carrying Capacity
  • Bone Structure
  • Who is present not just how many are
  • Attendance patterns (150 for 88)
  • Giving patterns (200 or 1200)
  • Expectations on Specializations
  • Conversation Contribution

Just remember:

“Growth isn’t always good and bigger is not always better.”

Why Do Church This Way?

Beginning this Sunday, I want to put a series of ideas in front on my congregation and brainstorm them together during Sunday School.  You can listen to the podcast audio here.

I am working on a clear way to present ‘Church 2.0’ or ‘ChurchNext’.

We will start with some history about different ways that the church has looked in different eras.

  • During the middle-ages it was primarily through sacrament.
  • 500 years ago the Protestant Reformation made it more about preaching.
  • Lately, music has become the main focus of the church and the primary way that people connect with God.

Here are the two really interesting things about that:

First, in each new era, the previous way still hangs around – it is just not as prominent.

So in the reformation, sacraments were still present but just not primary. Preaching was the main attraction.

Now in the ‘music’ era, we still have preaching and sacraments (for the most part) but in many circles they are secondary or driven by the music.

Second, I truly believe that we are about to enter a very different expression. This future of the church is going to be in:

  • participation
  • contribution
  • collaboration
  • conversation

Eventually people are going to get tired of being spectators at a weekly spectacle.  In so many other areas of life, people’s participation really matters. They get to contribute their unique insight, perspective, and experience. Then they come to church, sing the songs on the screen then sit and listen to a TEDtalk style sermon (I am being cheeky here).

If that works for people, I celebrate that and congratulate them. I mean them no harm … but for so many other people it is just not satisfying.

People are walking away from the church in record numbers – nones and dones are the fasting growing segment of religious affiliation on the most recent census data.

But there is a different way to do church that opens up the conversation to inquiry and doubt … it facilitates a thoughtful space to ask difficult questions.  That is my hope for doing church this way and for becoming a conversational community.

So why do church this way?

  • Why de-center the sermon?
  • Why utilize music to punctuate the gathering?
  • Why have sacraments once a month?

Embodied Wisdom Enacted Knowledge

You have a wisdom deep inside of you that you might not even know how to access.

I want to introduce (or remind) you to an amazing concept: phronesis

Here is a ‘7 min sermon’ on the idea and a short explanation below.

I love this concept so much.

An interesting way to access it is by using the famous formulation of:

  • known knowns (things we know that we know)
  • known unknowns (things we know that we don’t know)
  • unknown unknowns (things we don’t know that we don’t know)

Then Zizek reminds us that the 4th quadrant would be “unknown knowns”!!

There are things that we don’t even know that we know … and this is why we need to know about phronesis.

Another way of approaching the idea is to focus on the kind of knowledge that is produced:

  • phronesis (practical wisdom) in contrast to the modern fascination with
  • theoria (theoretical knowledge and thinking) or
  • techne (technical knowledge and thinking)

A helpful analogy can be found in learning to play a musical instrument:

“Playing the flute, Aristotle observes, has value and fulfills its purpose well before the music stops. This is especially the case with ethical conduct and political activity, an ongoing process of deliberation that requires practical wisdom (phronesis). In contrast, (he) viewed building a house as poiesis— satisfactory only when the construction process is complete.” [1]

Unfortunately, after Aristotle poiesis got subsumed into praxis and was reduced into the binary that we have inherited today in the classic split between theory and practice. The final, and perhaps most popular, of these concepts is habitus.

The habits of faith form a character in you through repetition and spiritual practice.

You have a wisdom down inside of you.
It operates on a lower register than your immediate thoughts.
It is not just head knowledge.
It is deep inside of you – down in your bones.
Learn to trust your gut and follow your heart.

[1] Cahalan and Mikoski, Opening the Field of Practical Theology, 305.

Billy Graham: Case Study

Graham’s life show us so much about the changes in our society and the church: from newspapers, TV, civil rights, evangelicals, politics, media, and so much more.

I was moving into my new office and purging some old files. I found a magazine (Promise Keepers) from 1997 that had Graham on the cover.

Here are some of my thoughts in this short video.



I would love to hear your thoughts, questions, and concerns.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑