Preparing for qualifying exams is intense. Going back over every book and paper that might be relevent to your five topics is helpful for compiling the work you have done over the last four years.
I am constantly thinking and reading about theology. One of my fascinations is the various models or frameworks that others employ to outline the theological endeavor. Some use a ‘landscape’ motif, with this group over here and that group over there, while others utilize a ‘spectrum’ analogy often moving from one ‘direction’ to the other.
One can do this in a historic sense, from classic on the left to contemporary on the right, or more of a conviction/conclusion breakdown with conservative at one end and liberal at the other.*
The first list I encountered was in my pre-doctoral prep when researching the discipline of Practical Theology I would often see the field contrasted with the ‘Big 4’ schools of theology:
- Systematic
- Historical
- Biblical
- Philosophic
Practical Theology is different in that, like Sociology, it utilizes qualitative methods like interviews, case studies and ethnography.
I also like Grenz and Olson’s approach in “Who Needs Theology: an invitation to the study of God“, where they move from:
- Folk to
- Lay to
- Ministerial to
- Professional to
- Academic
They don’t seem to find much value in either the Folk or the Academic (who only write for or can be understood by other academics) but they make a good case for the middle 3 approaches.
Recently I have come up with a different spectrum:
- Creedal
- Confessional
- Constructive
- Radical
Creedal asks “What has the church historically believed about this?”
Confessional asks “What do we as Christian say about this?”
Constructive asks “What can we as Christian say about this?” or “What do we want to say about this?”
Radical asks “If we weren’t bound by institutional constraints, what would we say about this?”
It wasn’t until I was updating this blog’s ‘Big Ideas’ page that I realized that my real passion is not a ‘constructive’ but a ‘comparative’ approach. I am fascinated by the diversity and complexity of faith communities and historically situated or contextual approaches. I love to survey the landscape first (comparative) and then figure out where I want to travel to or settle down (constructive).
This approach has been very helpful to me so I wanted to pass it along.
What about you? What spectrum or framework have you found helpful?
* Those who have read me before will know that I contest this second spectrum because there are schools outside or past liberal schools of thought and they are not accounted for but simply lumped into the liberal camp for lack of nuance and specificity.
Bo Sanders: Public Theology 