>There are going to be some changes for me and Everyday Theology in 2011. I am now in a PhD program and I have been trying to get a job. I have been able to get a couple of small part-time jobs for January-February, two of which will affect me publicly and privately.
My two gigs are with Religion Online [link] and Big Tent Christianity [link]. I am very excited about both, the first will impact me long-term, the second will be big in the short-term.
Here are the three changes to Everyday Theology in 2011:
- Everyday Theology will continue to be a weekly Podcast about the everyday implications of what we believe as Christians in the 21st century. I will put up the transcript every week where comments and questions can be posted. I love this conversation!
- I have several other projects which I will manage through my other Facebook account. You can participate with those other projects at Lead From the Fringe (my ‘quick thoughts’ blog) and Ethic Space and Faith (where I am an ‘Admin’ and sometimes author).
- In a PhD program, your time is spent a little differently than as a full time minister. My thought life and book selection are different and the expectation of how I interact with the material is consequently changing. I will need to adjust the content of the podcast a little bit in order to take advantage of the reading that I am already doing and also to practice the discipline of engaging current and historical authors and thinkers.
Some of you may know but, a couple of years ago I left a church that I loved very much and I did not know what going to Seminary would mean or how I would be able to bridge the gap with my new direction. It went better than expected and Everyday Theology has been a wonderful conversation to help me think through what it looks like to have a progressive christian faith in the real world.
The final thing I want to say is that I faced a big decision in the past months. I have taken great effort (and pride) in not being reactive, argumentative or inflammatory. I read a book almost a decade ago that impacted me radically. The book was called The Argument Culture and the author, Deborah Tannen, got to the very root of this damnable way that we conduct ourself in the west (especially North America including Canada).
Perhaps the biggest change for 2011 is the change that I have decided to pass up. I decided that I just don’t want to contribute to the argument culture and I certainly don’t want to be one of those christians who attack and criticize other christians (as much as I can possibly help it). So here is a story about why that decision has been so difficult.
______
I exist mostly in a progressive (not a capital P) christian context. That is what I would say is my community. Most of us have ‘emerged’ (not capital E) from a predominately evangelical-protestant- with charismatic leanings type heritage.
In my circles I have always assumed and heard that when public characters like Jerry Falwell sounded off on Hurricane Katrina being a punishment from God for the people of New Orleans – that most people rolled their eyes and knew that he was such a marginal expression that he should not be taken seriously.
or when Franklin Graham said that Islam (as if it were one thing) is a terrible religion filled with hate – that people knew he was not a spokesman for Christians (as if we are just one thing).
or when Mark Driscoll says that he could never worship a Jesus that he could beat up – that it carried about as much weight as a WWF wrestler mouthing off to get pumped up before a match, pulsing with vibrato and testosterone.
But apparently that is not the case.
Moving can be a powerful experience to encounter new perspectives. I recently moved A) regions of the country B) from a Masters program to a PhD program and C) from a school with ‘Evangelical’ in it’s name to a school that is widely known for being wildly liberal.
The weird part is that I have never heard more about hell. Honestly, it comes up several times a week in a variety of conversations and settings. There seems to be a collective obsession with who is going to hell and who gets to say who goes to hell. I have heard more about hell in the last 6 months than the last 6 years combined. It’s almost as if there is a collective trauma that has happened by so many people telling so many other types of people that they are going to hell. The people that I hang out with take great offense at being told that they are going to hell by our more conservative brethren.
SO here is the moment when I got some clarity:
In our readings for a class, the names Jerry Falwell, Franklin Graham, and Pat Roberson came up as the 3 examples of American Protestants . Two weeks before this class I was at a huge event at the LA Country Library for a global conversation between two nationally known authors – and these same three names came up.
It caused me to stop and think, “Wait – I thought that everyone knew that there were alway those marginal voices in any group – that there are clowns at every circus…” but they are not spokesman for the cause. They don’t speak for me and my circles.
So when our class presenter referenced this part of the reading (a mention that was noticeable because it was not the central focus of the reading) I perked up. The presenter said that they are a public face of Christianity – that when people who are not Christians think of Christianity , that is who they think of.
If this were true, I would have to change my approach.
I assumed that when people say Pat Robertson – Jerry Falwell – Franklin Graham they thought “affluent white male christian TV personalities”. I didn’t think that they thought “all Christians”.
When a group like the Gospel Coalition forms with people from that exact same demographic (only this time with a Calvinist bent) – I thought that people just saw a bunch of dogmatic guys from Reformed backgrounds… I am starting to reconsider that.
Lest you think that I am I being too optimistic or that I am being too naive… I have an agenda – I am trying to figure out if the Big Tent vision of Christianity is big enough to include those who think that there is a very small tent that they are not only IN, but are in charge of .
I have been giving everyone the benefit of the doubt that they knew that there is not just one type of Jewish (Orthodox, Conservative, Reformed, etc.) – that there is not just one type of Christian – that there is not just one type of Muslim – that there is not just one type of Atheist… that the world is very nuanced! Does everything just get boiled down to a soundbite?
At that point, I was thinking that maybe I need to become more aggressive and more confrontational. Now I think that we already have too much of that and have decided to just stick with this M.O. and be who I feel called to be. I can not be responsible for the big picture or determine the outcome. All I can do is play the role I am suppose to play and bring my best to the table.
I hope that you have a wonderful NewYear and I am looking forward to the ongoing conversation in 2011.
December 30, 2010 at 8:29 pm
>Great questions, Bo. How big is the big tent? Something I find myself pondering as well.
December 31, 2010 at 2:57 am
>Yeah!! That is the big one – for sure. I am so excited to start this new January series. I am going to look at communion, crucifixion, violence and power as my 4 weekly topics. My approach is to do each topic in 3 acts, the first of which to outline the landscape – how Big the big tent is!act 2 will be where I am currently at, and act 3 will be a new idea I found in some other thinker or tradition. should be fun…
December 31, 2010 at 5:19 am
>Looking forward to everything! Your mention of the Big Tent, and wondering whether there is room for people who think the tent is small and that they are in charge of it…I picture some people who are standing on the edges of the metaphorical tent and accusing anyone who is there of actually being outside the 'real' tent. And the response is to stare back at them blankly, because I'm not interested in accusations. It is SO HARD. Because I WANT their opinions, their pushback, and their critique. In some ways I NEED it because I have blind spots and assumptions and moments (however brief 🙂 of thoughtlessness. But it seems like the conversation has, with some people, stopped being generative. With some conversations, my response is, "I hear your critique, I understand why you think and say that, and I still disagree." Misunderstanding can be clarified with further dialogue, but sometimes there's no misunderstanding at all! We're just going down different paths. AND! Based on their path, it's even understandable why they'd keep yelling at me while I'm on mine (they sincerely desire me to join their path). I wish they'd stop, but it doesn't seem likely. Does being part of the Big Tent require that we admit there is a tent, it isn't small (in fact it's big enough that you're uncomfortable with how big it is), and we're not in charge of it?
December 31, 2010 at 5:53 am
>Oh man – yah – this is going to be tough – no doubt. I have to draw my 'line' big enough to include those that might not want to be in my 'in' and also those who they say are definitely 'out'. That's tricky.I am not pretending it is going to be easy 🙂 but I have three things working in my favor! a) we are in post-Christendom and the old frameworks and ways of thinking are slowly dying. b) the Christian scripture says that they ARE the body of Christ (with us) and so they ARE included. c) I am suspicious that Jesus is not coming back for a while… the longer that goes, the more time we have to work this out and the more incentive we have to do so 😉
January 2, 2011 at 5:48 pm
>Some thoughts on Big Tent/bounded-set Christianity from my friend, Zach to add to the conversation: http://zhoag.com/the-definite-article
January 2, 2011 at 7:52 pm
>Thanks for sharing that. It was a GOOD article! I am headed there now to post.
January 5, 2011 at 4:57 am
>Love this conveaton, Bo. Great food for thought!
January 5, 2011 at 5:16 am
>Russ Pierson my friend!! SO good to hear from you. This series in the early part of 2011 should be a HOOT. I glad that you are on board for it 🙂 I will look forward to your input – you are a valuable partner in this conversation.Hope all is well with you.